Astute reader wargut responded to yesterday’s observation about the Fahrenheit scale being affine-ish with the following incorrect assertion:

Seriously, guys, your system is bullsh~t.

It’s on.

First, the Kelvin scale is indisputably the best of {K,℉,℃} for physics. Given that ∃ a natural zero it should be reflected in the measurement system.

American exceptionalism

But Fahrenheit is the best scale for everyday use. We are not in the science lab, so all of Centigrade’s properties that are nice in chemistry class don’t matter.

Celsians brag that 0 ℃ and 100 ℃ make it easy to remember where water boils and freezes. So what? Fahrenheit makes it easy to remember the temperature of the human body and icy seawater. Or roughly the hottest day and the coldest day.

image

Outdoor temperatures in Indiana range from −17 ℃ on the coldest day of winter to 39 ℃ on the hottest day of summer. During the seasons I would be outdoors for more than the necessary minimum—March to November—the daily highs are between 7℃ and 29 ℃.

So most of the relevant temperature variation – the vast differences throughout all of spring, summer, and fall – are restricted to only 23 integers. (I could use decimals, if I wanted to sound like a robot.)

image

When I lived in ℃ places I had to pay attention to single-digit differences like 24 ℃ versus 29 ℃, wasting the first digit.

Celsius is a scale for science, not for humans.

In Fahrenheit I get the basic idea with the first digit.

  • “It’s in the thirties” = multiple layers and coat.
  • “It’s in the nineties” = T shirt weather.

In the 70’s and 80’s I want a second sig-fig but I don’t even need 10 elements of precision. Just “upper 70’s” is enough. The first ℉ digit gives you ballpark, and the second ℉ digit gives you even more precision than you need.

image** **

In a sentence: Fahrenheit uses its digits more efficiently than Centigrade. Centigrade adopts the decimal convention but then throws away 70% of the range. Fahrenheit’s gradations are so well tuned that it only requires {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} × {low, medium, high}, for a cognitive savings of 7 unneeded numbers in each of 9 decades.

Celsius may be better for chemistry. Fahrenheit is better for real life.

593 notes

  1. sasqwatch6 reblogged this from isomorphismes
  2. tpartyinwonderland reblogged this from isomorphismes
  3. the-mister-law reblogged this from isomorphismes
  4. makemeister reblogged this from isomorphismes and added:
    —agreed. I love the metric system, but would rather us Fahrenheit instead of centigrade.
  5. carazon reblogged this from isomorphismes
  6. mudshark58 reblogged this from isomorphismes
  7. merrabeth reblogged this from isomorphismes and added:
    21wanderlust21
  8. shadowedkitten reblogged this from isomorphismes
  9. kaleran reblogged this from silk-over-steel
  10. silk-over-steel reblogged this from waywardbard
  11. punkrockandpastels reblogged this from alder-berry
  12. alder-berry reblogged this from waywardbard
  13. waywardbard reblogged this from isomorphismes
  14. ilivewithintheshadows reblogged this from silverleavesofautumn
  15. silverleavesofautumn reblogged this from peggytheheadsmasher
  16. peggytheheadsmasher reblogged this from wellbehavedwomendomakehistory
  17. fairly-disingenuous-assertions reblogged this from isomorphismes
  18. ilosttrackofthings reblogged this from gettothestabbing
  19. herecomesthemorning reblogged this from wellbehavedwomendomakehistory and added:
    I’VE ALWAYS THOUGHT THIS THANK YOU
  20. gettothestabbing reblogged this from wellbehavedwomendomakehistory
  21. c-h-r-y-s-o-c-o-l-l-a reblogged this from wifi-is-my-life-i and added:
    shut up…
  22. wifi-is-my-life-i reblogged this from wellbehavedwomendomakehistory